My thanks to the reader who alerted me to this article:
Academics, universities and government agencies are overhauling or ending research programs to counter the spread of online misinformation amid a legal effort from conservative politicians and activists who accuse them of colluding with tech companies to censor right-wing views, says The Washington Post.
The escalating effort — led by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and other Republicans in Congress and state government — has cast a pall over programs that study the quality of medical information online, in addition to political falsehoods, the Post says.
For example, Stanford University officials who face litigation are discussing how they can continue tracking election-related misinformation through the Election Integrity Partnership, a consortium that flagged social media conspiracies about voting in 2020 and 2022, the Post says.
And the National Institutes of Health froze a $150 million program intended to communicate medical information, citing regulatory and legal threats. Doctors told The Post they'd planned to use the grants to fund projects on noncontroversial topics such as nutritional guidelines, not just politically charged issues like vaccines.
Meanwhile, social media platforms have pulled back on moderating content even as evidence mounts that Russia and China have intensified covert influence campaigns, the Post says.
The most high-profile effort is the lawsuit Missouri v. Biden, the Post says. It’s now before the Supreme Court, where the Biden administration seeks to have the court block a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that found the White House, FBI and top federal health officials likely violated the First Amendment by improperly influencing tech firms’ decisions to remove or suppress posts on the coronavirus and elections.
Jordan has issued subpoenas and demands for researchers’ communications with the government and social media platforms as part of a larger congressional probe of the Biden administration’s alleged collusion with Big Tech.
Nadgey Louis-Charles, a spokeswoman for the House Judiciary Committee, which Jordan chairs, says the investigation is focused on “the federal government’s involvement in speech censorship, and the investigation’s purpose is to inform legislative solutions for how to protect free speech.”
Many academics, independent scholars and philanthropic funders are discussing ways to collectively defend the disinformation research field, says the Post. One proposal would create a group to collect donations in a central fund to pay for crisis communications and legal support if one of them is sued or subpoenaed in a private case or by Congress. The money also could fund cybersecurity counseling to ward off hackers and stalkers.