The measure won final passage by a vote of 64 to 0, after all the opposition members in the 120-seat Knesset (parliament) walked out.
In the vote, lawmakers approved a measure that prevents judges from striking down government decisions on the basis they are “unreasonable.”
The government’s critics say removing the standard of reasonability opens the way to corruption and improper appointments of unqualified cronies to important positions. The Supreme Court, for example, this year rejected Netanyahu’s appointment of a key ally for interior and finance minister as unreasonable because of past convictions for bribery and tax cheating.
Given Israel’s relatively weak system of checks and balances, the judiciary plays a big role in checking executive power in the country, says The Associated Press.
That leaves the judiciary as “the only check on governmental power,” says constitutional law professor Amichai Cohen.
Israel also has minimal local governance and no formal constitution. This means most of the power is centralized in parliament, Cohen says. The “basic laws” — foundational laws that experts describe as a sort of informal constitution — can be changed at any time by a majority.
Historically, the Israeli judiciary has played a role in protecting the rights of minorities, from Palestinian citizens of Israel to noncitizens and African asylum seekers, Cohen says.
The protests prompted Netanyahu to pause the overhaul in March and enter talks with opposition lawmakers. But the talks broke down last month.
By weakening the judiciary, critics say, Israel’s government — the most right-wing, nationalist and religiously conservative in the country’s history, led by a male-dominated coalition whose members have advocated full annexation of the occupied West Bank, discriminating against LGBTQ+ people and Palestinian citizens of Israel, and limiting the rights of women — will have near-total control.
Comments