The convention was designed to tackle four missions critical to Clinton’s chances for success in November, says Gerald Seib of The Wall Street Journal: Make people like her more, make people like Trump less, unify a fractured party and reconnect with white working-class voters.
So did Democrats succeed?
Clinton “carries the blessing and the curse” of having been a national political figure for a quarter of a century, so views of her are fairly hardened and hard to change," says Seib.
Even this week, with his comments on Russia, Trump gave Democrats ammunition as they sought to get voters to like him less, Seib says.
Efforts for Democratic unity went better than had been expected, Seib says, as Sanders “abandoned weeks of seeming to accept defeat only grudgingly, and finally embraced his foe unequivocally.”
Seib says he’s surprised the convention wasn’t staged to appeal more to working-class whites.
“For three days, the party’s embrace of diversity in race, gender and sexual orientation was on full display,” says Seib. "Less numerous were the odes to those who wear hard hats, or drive trucks or go bowling. Finally, Thursday night, a factory worker, a home-care provider and a laid-off restaurant worker appeared on stage.”
A New York Times analysis of Clinton’s acceptance speech Thursday says it was aimed to increase public recognition of her readiness for the job of president and didn’t tackle the issue of trust.
"By now it is all but impossible for Mrs. Clinton to shake herself loose from the elaborate, decades-old scaffold of assumptions — built up by scandal and bolted in place by her enemies — that her motives are impure,” the Times says.
Dan Balz of The Washington Post says:
"The presidential election probably will turn on a calculation that all voters will be making, a balance between the desire for change and the fear of risk — the change Trump’s outsider candidacy promises vs. the risk his presidency might bring. Clinton was not, in the end, trying to sell her soft side on Thursday night. Instead she was looking to persuade even those who have their doubts about honesty that her experience as a political insider offers the better combination of change and risk.”
Here is a fact check of Clinton’s acceptance speech, from the Post.